From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meacham v. Noonan Construction Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 25, 1972
260 So. 2d 235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

Opinion

No. O-488.

March 23, 1972. Rehearing Denied April 25, 1972.

Appeal from Court of Record, Escambia County; M.C. Blanchard, Judge.

Wilmer H. Mitchell, of Holsberry, Emmanuel, Sheppard Mitchell, Pensacola, for appellants.

Joe J. Harrell, of Harrell, Wiltshire, Bozeman, Clark Stone, and Robert P. Gaines, of Beggs, Lane, Daniel, Gaines Davis, Pensacola, for appellees.


This appeal challenges the correctness of a final summary judgment rendered in favor of appellees.

A careful examination of the record on appeal conclusively establishes the absence of any genuine triable issue of a material fact with respect to appellees' liability for the damages suffered by appellants, and that appellees were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The judgment appealed is accordingly affirmed. 23 Fla.Jur. 281, Negligence, § 37; DeLuca v. Manchester Laundry Dry Cleaning Company (1955) 380 Pa. 484, 112 A.2d 372; Kite v. Jones (1957) 389 Pa. 339, 132 A.2d 683; Cotter v. Bell (1965) 417 Pa. 560, 208 A.2d 216; Tuz v. Burmeister (Fla.App. 1971) 254 So.2d 569; General Telephone Company of Florida, Inc. v. Mahr (Fla.App. 1963) 153 So.2d 13.

SPECTOR, C.J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Meacham v. Noonan Construction Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 25, 1972
260 So. 2d 235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)
Case details for

Meacham v. Noonan Construction Co.

Case Details

Full title:CLYDE MEACHAM ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. NOONAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, A…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Apr 25, 1972

Citations

260 So. 2d 235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

Citing Cases

Savage v. Bell

Affirmed. Meacham v. Noonan Construction Co., 260 So.2d 235 (1 Fla.App. 1972); and General Telephone Co. of…