From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

M.E. v. City of Tacoma

Supreme Court of Washington.
Jan 6, 2021
196 Wash. 2d 1035 (Wash. 2021)

Opinion

No. 99068-9

01-06-2021

M.E. & J.E., THROUGH John R. WILSON, Litigation Guardian Ad Litem, et al., Petitioners, v. CITY OF TACOMA, Respondent.


ORDER

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Stephens and Justices Madsen, González, Yu, and Whitener (Justice Johnson sat for Justice Madsen), considered at its January 5, 2021, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review is denied.

For the Court

/s/ Stephens, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

M.E. v. City of Tacoma

Supreme Court of Washington.
Jan 6, 2021
196 Wash. 2d 1035 (Wash. 2021)
Case details for

M.E. v. City of Tacoma

Case Details

Full title:M.E. & J.E., THROUGH John R. WILSON, Litigation Guardian Ad Litem, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Jan 6, 2021

Citations

196 Wash. 2d 1035 (Wash. 2021)
478 P.3d 90

Citing Cases

W.M. v. State

¶ 42 This court recently addressed a similar question in M.E. v. City of Tacoma , 15 Wash. App. 2d 21, 471…

Velazquez Framing, LLC v. Cascadia Homes, Inc.

A. LEGAL PRINCIPLES ¶15 We review summary judgment motions de novo. M.E. through McKasy v. City of Tacoma ,…