From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Md. Cas. Co. v. Efficient Solutions, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 8, 2013
10-CV-266 (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 8, 2013)

Opinion

10-CV-266

03-08-2013

MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. EFFICIENT SOLUTIONS, INC. And DALE DAHLGREN, Defendants.


ORDER

The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr., pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On February 14, 2013, Magistrate Judge Schroeder filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that defendants' motions for summary judgment be denied and plaintiff's cross motions for summary judgment be granted. In addition, plaintiff shall have no obligation to defend and/or indemnify the defendants in the underlying state court action.

The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby

ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Schroeder's Report and Recommendation, defendants' motions for summary judgment are denied and plaintiff's cross motions for summary judgment are granted. In addition, plaintiff shall have no obligation to defend and/or indemnify the defendants in the underlying state court action.

The Clerk of Court shall take all steps necessary to close the case.

SO ORDERED.

_________________

HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Md. Cas. Co. v. Efficient Solutions, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 8, 2013
10-CV-266 (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Md. Cas. Co. v. Efficient Solutions, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. EFFICIENT SOLUTIONS, INC. And…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 8, 2013

Citations

10-CV-266 (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 8, 2013)