From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McWhirter v. Selembo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 20, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:12-CV-704 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 20, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:12-CV-704

12-20-2012

JOHN R. MCWHIRTER, et al. Plaintiffs v. GEORGE J. SELEMBO, JR., et al. Defendants


(Chief Judge Kane)

(Magistrate Judge Schwab)


ORDER

Before the Court in the above-captioned action is a November 26, 2012 report of the Magistrate Judge. No timely objections have been filed.

AND NOW, upon review of the record and the applicable law, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carlson.

2) The Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs motion to dismiss the complaint lodged against them by the Plaintiffs (Doc. No. 12.), is DENIED without prejudice.

3) The case is REMANDED to Magistrate Judge Schwab for further proceedings.

_________________

YVETTE KANE, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

McWhirter v. Selembo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 20, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:12-CV-704 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 20, 2012)
Case details for

McWhirter v. Selembo

Case Details

Full title:JOHN R. MCWHIRTER, et al. Plaintiffs v. GEORGE J. SELEMBO, JR., et al…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Dec 20, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:12-CV-704 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 20, 2012)