From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McSweeney v. Cohen

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 18, 2024
24-cv-1503 (LJL) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 18, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-1503 (LJL)

07-18-2024

LEAH MCSWEENEY, Plaintiffs, v. ANDY COHEN ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER

LEWIS J. LIMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendants' motion to file certain documents submitted in connection with its motion to dismiss the first amended complaint, Dkt. No. 61, is granted. The Court has reviewed individually each of the documents which Defendants seek to file in redacted form under the standards set forth in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119 (2d Cir. 2006). The limited redactions satisfy those standards because they either contain confidential business, financial and marketing information the disclosure of which could lead to competitive harm, see Jackpocket, Inc. v. LottoMatrix NY LLC, 2022 WL 17738779, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 15, 2022), or implicate privacy interests, Bernstein v. Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP, 814 F.3d 132, 143 (2d Cir. 2016).

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motion at Dkt. No. 61.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McSweeney v. Cohen

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 18, 2024
24-cv-1503 (LJL) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 18, 2024)
Case details for

McSweeney v. Cohen

Case Details

Full title:LEAH MCSWEENEY, Plaintiffs, v. ANDY COHEN ET AL., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 18, 2024

Citations

24-cv-1503 (LJL) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 18, 2024)

Citing Cases

Spencer-Smith v. Ehrlich

The Court has considered the factors set forth in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir.…