From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McSwain v. Heinemann

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Feb 18, 2022
1:21-cv-317 (W.D. Mich. Feb. 18, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-317

02-18-2022

SHAWN MCSWAIN, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN HEINEMANN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

HALA Y. JARBOU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On December 29, 2021, Magistrate Judge Ray Kent issued a Report and Recommendation (R&R) recommending that Defendants Kathleen Heinemann and Warden Bryan Morrison's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 63) be granted and that this action be terminated. (ECF No. 70.) The R&R was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed, and the deadline for doing so expired on February 17, 2022. On review, the Court concludes that the R&R correctly analyzes the issues and makes a sound recommendation.

After Plaintiff requested additional time to respond to the R&R, the Court gave him until February 17, 2022, to file objections. He did not meet the extended deadline.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the R&R (ECF No. 70) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Heinemann and Warden Morrison's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 63) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court CERTIFIES that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

A judgment will issue in accordance with this order.


Summaries of

McSwain v. Heinemann

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Feb 18, 2022
1:21-cv-317 (W.D. Mich. Feb. 18, 2022)
Case details for

McSwain v. Heinemann

Case Details

Full title:SHAWN MCSWAIN, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN HEINEMANN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Feb 18, 2022

Citations

1:21-cv-317 (W.D. Mich. Feb. 18, 2022)