McSorley v. Hertz Corp.

43 Citing cases

  1. May v. National Union Fire Insurance Company

    84 F.3d 1342 (10th Cir. 1996)   Cited 5 times
    Holding that the statutory minimum amount of coverage is all that a claimant is owed for UM coverage in the absence of a UM coverage waiver

    In Cofer v. Morton, 784 P.2d 67, 70 (Okla. 1989), this Court held that "[r]ights of recovery under the Uninsured Motorist Act [Section(s) 3636] are governed by the statute in effect on the date of issuance or last renewal of the policy against which an uninsured motorist claim is made." Accord McSorley v. Hertz Corp., 885 P.2d 1343, 1344 n. 1 (Okla. 1994); Uptegraft v. Home Ins. Co., 662 P.2d 681, 684 n. 2 (Okla. 1983). As previously set forth, UM coverage was imputed to National Gypsum's policy before the 1990 changes to Section(s) 3636.

  2. Hall v. Galmor

    2018 OK 59 (Okla. 2018)   Cited 15 times
    Discussing James Energy Co. v. HCG Energy Corp., 1992 OK 117, 847 P.2d 333, and its statement "the lessor must demand that an implied covenant be complied with before a court of equity will grant a forfeiture"

    ' " (quoting Hamrick v. George , 1962 OK 247, ¶ 7, 378 P.2d 324, 326 ) ).Cox , 2004 OK 17, ¶ 19, 87 P.3d at 615 (citing McSorley v. Hertz Corp. , 1994 OK 120, ¶ 6, 885 P.2d 1343, 1346 ; Smicklas v. Spitz , 1992 OK 145, ¶ 8, 846 P.2d 362, 366 ; Oglesby v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. , 1992 OK 61, ¶ 8, 832 P.2d 834, 839-40 ); City of Midwest City v. Harris , 1977 OK 7, ¶ 6, 561 P.2d 1357, 1358.Cox , 2004 OK 17, ¶ 19, 87 P.3d at 615 (citing Haney v. State , 1993 OK 41, ¶ 5, 850 P.2d 1087, 1089 ; Pub. Serv. Co. of Okla. v. State ex rel. Corp. Comm'n , 1992 OK 153, ¶ 8, 842 P.2d 750, 752 ).

  3. Krug v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.

    2015 OK 74 (Okla. 2015)   Cited 14 times
    Concluding that the PRSA was inapplicable to that case

    Except when a contrary intention plainly appears, terms are given their plain and ordinary meaning.Oklahoma Ass'n for Equitable Taxation v. City of Oklahoma City, 1995 OK 62, ¶ 5, 901 P.2d 800; McSorley v. Hertz Corp., 1994 OK 120, ¶ 6, 885 P.2d 1343; Smicklas v. Spitz, 1992 OK 145, ¶ 8, 846 P.2d 362.Oklahoma Ass'n for Equitable Taxation v. City of Oklahoma City, see note 10, supra; McSorley v. Hertz Corp., see note 10, supra; Oglesby v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 1992 OK 61, ¶ 8, 832 P.2d 834.

  4. Murray Cnty. ex rel. Murray Cnty. v. HomeSales, Inc.

    330 P.3d 519 (Okla. 2014)   Cited 23 times
    Deciding all counties' rights to collect taxes pursuant to the Documentary Stamp Tax Act, 68 O.S.2011 §§ 3201 through 3206, in an action brought by only two of the seventy-seven affected counties

    The fact that it did not supports the conclusion that the Legislature did not intend for counties to have direct enforcement authority to collect unpaid taxes. See McSorley v. Hertz Corp., 1994 OK 120, ¶ 19, 885 P.2d 1343, 1350–51 (omission of self-insurers from the list of those statutorily required to offer uninsured motorist coverage was evidence of legislative intent not to require self-insurers to offer uninsured motorist coverage). Nor can we conclude that this omission was inadvertent, at least with respect to the DSTA.

  5. Smith v. City of Stillwater & the Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs for Payne Cnty.

    328 P.3d 1192 (Okla. 2014)   Cited 73 times

    White v. Lim, 2009 OK 79, ¶ 12, 224 P.3d 679; Head v. McCracken, 2004 OK 84, ¶ 13, 102 P.3d 670; Balfour v. Nelson, 1994 OK 149, ¶ 8, 890 P.2d 916. Keating v. Edmondson, 2001 OK 110, ¶ 8, 37 P.3d 882; McSorley v. Hertz Corp., 1994 OK 120, ¶ 6, 885 P.2d 1343; Oglesby v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 1992 OK 61, ¶ 8, 832 P.2d 834. Haney v. State, 1993 OK 41, ¶ 5, 850 P.2d 1087; Public Serv. Co. of Oklahoma v. State ex rel. Corp. Comm'n, 1992 OK 153, ¶ 8, 842 P.2d 750.

  6. Cattlemen's Steakhouse, Inc. v. Waldenville

    318 P.3d 1105 (Okla. 2013)   Cited 11 times

    White v. Lim, 2009 OK 79, ¶ 12, 224 P.3d 679;Head v. McCracken, 2004 OK 84, ¶ 13, 102 P.3d 670;Balfour v. Nelson, 1994 OK 149, ¶ 8, 890 P.2d 916.Keating v. Edmondson, 2001 OK 110, ¶ 8, 37 P.3d 882;McSorley v. Hertz Corp., 1994 OK 120, ¶ 6, 885 P.2d 1343;Oglesby v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 1992 OK 61, ¶ 8, 832 P.2d 834.Haney v. State, 1993 OK 41, ¶ 5, 850 P.2d 1087;Public Serv. Co. of Oklahoma v. State ex rel. Corp. Comm'n, 1992 OK 153, ¶ 8, 842 P.2d 750.

  7. Cattlemen's Steakhouse Inc. v. Waldenville

    2013 OK 95 (Okla. 2013)   Cited 11 times

    White v. Lim, 2009 OK 79, ¶12, 224 P.3d 679; Head v. McCracken, 2004 OK 84, ¶13, 102 P.3d 670; Balfour v. Nelson, 1994 OK 149, ¶8, 890 P.2d 916, 39 A.L.R.5th 935. Keating v. Edmondson, 2001 OK 110, ¶8, 37 P.3d 882; McSorley v. Hertz Corp., 1994 OK 120, ¶6, 885 P.2d 1343; Oglesby v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 1992 OK 61, ¶8, 832 P.2d 834. Haney v. State, 1993 OK 41, ¶5, 850 P.2d 1087; Public Serv. Co. of Oklahoma v. Stateex rel. Corp. Comm'n, 1992 OK 153, ¶8, 842 P.2d 750.

  8. Ledbetter v. Howard

    2012 OK 39 (Okla. 2012)   Cited 13 times
    In Ledbetter, the Supreme Court was upholding the grant of a new trial and showed proper deference to the trial court's decision.

    White v. Lim, 2009 OK 79, ¶ 12, 224 P.3d 679;Head v. McCracken, 2004 OK 84, ¶ 13, 102 P.3d 670;Balfour v. Nelson, 1994 OK 149, ¶ 8, 890 P.2d 916, 39 A.L.R.5th 935.Keating v. Edmondson, 2001 OK 110, ¶ 8, 37 P.3d 882;McSorley v. Hertz Corp., 1994 OK 120, ¶ 6, 885 P.2d 1343;Oglesby v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 1992 OK 61, ¶ 8, 832 P.2d 834.Haney v. State, 1993 OK 41, ¶ 5, 850 P.2d 1087;Public Serv. Co. of Oklahoma v. State ex rel. Corp. Comm'n, 1992 OK 153, ¶ 8, 842 P.2d 750.

  9. Howard v. Nitro–Lift Techs., L.L.C.

    2011 OK 98 (Okla. 2012)   Cited 11 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding provision unreasonable when individuals may "seek employment on their own initiative rather than from any intervention by the employee"

    27. White v. Lim, 2009 OK 79, ¶ 12, 224 P.3d 679; Head v. McCracken, 2004 OK 84, ¶ 13, 102 P.3d 670; Balfour v. Nelson, 1994 OK 149, ¶ 8, 890 P.2d 916, 39 A.L.R.5th 935. 28. Keating v. Edmondson, 2001 OK 110, ¶ 8, 37 P.3d 882; McSorley v. Hertz Corp., 1994 OK 120, ¶ 6, 885 P.2d 1343; Oglesby v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 1992 OK 61, ¶ 8, 832 P.2d 834. 29. Haney v. State, 1993 OK 41, ¶ 5, 850 P.2d 1087; Public Serv. Co. of Oklahoma v. State ex rel. Corp. Comm'n, 1992 OK 153, ¶ 8, 842 P.2d 750.

  10. Oklahoma Pub. Emps. Ass'n v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Office of Pers. Mgmt.

    2011 OK 68 (Okla. 2011)   Cited 21 times

    FN11. Smicklas v. Spitz, 1992 OK 145, ¶ 8, 846 P.2d 362; Clifton v. Clifton, 1990 OK 88, ¶ 7, 801 P.2d 693; Fuller v. Odom, 1987 OK 64, ¶ 4, 741 P.2d 449. FN12. Tyler v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co., see note 10, supra; McSorley v. Hertz Corp., 1994 OK 120, ¶ 6, 885 P.2d 1343; Oglesby v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 1992 OK 61, ¶ 8, 832 P.2d 834. FN13. Hill v. Board of Education, see note 15, infra; Haney v. State, 1993 OK 41, ¶ 5, 850 P.2d 1087; Public Serv. Co. of Oklahoma v. State ex rel. Corp. Comm'n, 1992 OK 153, ¶ 8, 842 P.2d 750.