From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MCSi, Inc. v. Woods

United States District Court, N.D. California
Feb 25, 2003
No. C 02-02865 JF (RS) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 25, 2003)

Summary

In MCSi, a federal court formulated a rule that statements by a commercial competitor about the competition are not matters of public interest.

Summary of this case from Integrated Healthcare Holdings, Inc. v. Fitzgibbons

Opinion

No. C 02-02865 JF (RS)

February 25, 2003


ORDER VACATING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE


TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:

At the case management conference held on December 16, 2003 in the captioned matter, the Honorable Jeremy Fogel referred this case to Magistrate Judge Richard Seeborg for a settlement conference. On January 16, 2003, Judge Fogel issued his Order Appointing Special Master to oversee all pretrial matters, including alternative dispute resolution. Since the Settlement Conference Order was issued subsequent to Judge Fogel's order appointing a special master, the Settlement Conference set for March 21, 2003 at 9:30 a.m. is hereby vacated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

MCSi, Inc. v. Woods

United States District Court, N.D. California
Feb 25, 2003
No. C 02-02865 JF (RS) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 25, 2003)

In MCSi, a federal court formulated a rule that statements by a commercial competitor about the competition are not matters of public interest.

Summary of this case from Integrated Healthcare Holdings, Inc. v. Fitzgibbons
Case details for

MCSi, Inc. v. Woods

Case Details

Full title:MCSi, INC., Plaintiff, v. ROBERT B. WOODS, et al, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Feb 25, 2003

Citations

No. C 02-02865 JF (RS) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 25, 2003)

Citing Cases

Moreau v. Daily Indep.

In addition, the California Supreme Court has held that "[w]eb sites accessible to the public . . . are…

Kagewerks, Inc. v. Kalasho

(Barrett v. Rosenthal (2006) 40 Cal.4th 33, 41, fn. 4 (Barrett) citing Huntingdon Life Sciences, Inc. v. Stop…