From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McShain v. Goodwin

United States District Court, D. Maryland
Feb 26, 2008
Civil No. JFM-07-3473 (D. Md. Feb. 26, 2008)

Opinion

Civil No. JFM-07-3473.

February 26, 2008


MEMORANDUM


Plaintiff has filed this pro se action against two individual defendants for age discrimination and retaliation under Title VII and the ADEA. Plaintiff's prior employer was Local 2 of the Office and Professional Employees International Union. Defendants have filed motions to dismiss on the ground that as individuals they are not "employers" within the meaning of either Title VII or the ADEA.

After being advised of the consequences of a failure to do so, plaintiff has not responded to the motions. The motions are well-founded. See Birkbeck v. Marvel Lighting Corp., 30 F.3d 507, 510-11 (4th Cir. 1994) (no individual liability under the ADEA); Lissau v. Southern Food Service, Inc., 159 F.3d 177, 178 (4th Cir. 1998) (no individual liability under Title VII). Accordingly, defendants' motions will be granted, and this action will be dismissed.

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, it is, this 26th day of February 2008

ORDERED

1. Defendants' motions to dismiss are granted; and

2. This action is dismissed for failure to state any claim upon which relief can be granted.


Summaries of

McShain v. Goodwin

United States District Court, D. Maryland
Feb 26, 2008
Civil No. JFM-07-3473 (D. Md. Feb. 26, 2008)
Case details for

McShain v. Goodwin

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL McSHAIN v. MICHAEL GOODWIN, ET AL

Court:United States District Court, D. Maryland

Date published: Feb 26, 2008

Citations

Civil No. JFM-07-3473 (D. Md. Feb. 26, 2008)