From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MCS Marketing, Inc. v. Univ. of Akron

Court of Claims of Ohio
Dec 20, 2004
2004 Ohio 7300 (Ohio Misc. 2004)

Opinion

Case No. 2003-05381.

December 20, 2004.

Marco E. Graves, 4758 Ridge Road, PMB 116, Brooklyn, Ohio 44144-3327, Attorney for Plaintiff/Counter Defendant.

Randall W. Knutti, Assistant Attorney General, 150 East Gay Street, 23rd Floor, Columbus, Ohio 43215-3130,

Christopher J. Carney, Charles D. Price, Special Counsel to Attorney General, 1001 Lakeside Avenue, Suite 1600, Cleveland, Ohio 44114, Attorneys for Defendant/Counter Plaintiff.


JUDGMENT ENTRY


{¶ 1} On September 30, 2004, the court entered judgment in favor of plaintiff/counter defendant in the amount of $33,378.97 on the complaint and judgment in favor of defendant/counter plaintiff in the amount of $133,621.03 on the counterclaim. Both judgments were held in abeyance pending a decision by defendant/counter plaintiff whether to conduct an accounting of plaintiff/counter defendant's records.

{¶ 2} On October 19, 2004, plaintiff/counter defendant filed a motion for reconsideration. On October 20, 2004, the court conducted a conference with the parties. As a result of the conference, defendant/counter plaintiff informed the court that it no longer desired an accounting.

{¶ 3} On November 19, 2004, defendant/counter plaintiff filed a response to the motion for reconsideration and on November 30, 2004, plaintiff/counter defendant filed a reply. Upon review, the court is not convinced that its September 30, 2004, judgment was in error. Accordingly, the motion for reconsideration is DENIED.

{¶ 4} Accordingly, judgment is hereby entered in favor of plaintiff/counter defendant on the complaint in the total amount of $33,378.97, which includes the filing fee paid by plaintiff/counter defendant. Judgment is rendered in favor of defendant/counter plaintiff on the counterclaim in the total amount of $133,621.03. Each judgment is to be satisfied out of the funds currently held in plaintiff/counter defendant's Bank One, Chicago account. Court costs are assessed equally against both parties. The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.


Summaries of

MCS Marketing, Inc. v. Univ. of Akron

Court of Claims of Ohio
Dec 20, 2004
2004 Ohio 7300 (Ohio Misc. 2004)
Case details for

MCS Marketing, Inc. v. Univ. of Akron

Case Details

Full title:MCS Marketing, Inc., Plaintiff/Counter Defendant, v. The University of…

Court:Court of Claims of Ohio

Date published: Dec 20, 2004

Citations

2004 Ohio 7300 (Ohio Misc. 2004)

Citing Cases

Banks v. Found. Auto. Corp.

Moreover, “[t]he application of the doctrine of commercial frustration is a question of law to be determined…