From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McQueen v. Napel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 25, 2012
Case Number 08-10586 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 25, 2012)

Opinion

Case Number 08-10586

09-25-2012

JAMES MCQUEEN, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT NAPEL, Defendant.


Honorable David M. Lawson

Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION,

AND DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Presently before the Court is the report issued on September 5, 2012 by Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), recommending that this Court deny the defendant's motion for reconsideration. Although the Magistrate Judge's report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, no objections have been filed thus far. The parties' failure to file objections to the Report and Recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the Magistrate Judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court agrees with the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [dkt. #36] is ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that the defendant's motion for reconsideration [dkt. #33] is DENIED.

____________________

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

PROOF OF SERVICE


The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on September 25, 2012.


Deborah R. Tofil

DEBORAH R. TOFIL


Summaries of

McQueen v. Napel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 25, 2012
Case Number 08-10586 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 25, 2012)
Case details for

McQueen v. Napel

Case Details

Full title:JAMES MCQUEEN, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT NAPEL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 25, 2012

Citations

Case Number 08-10586 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 25, 2012)