From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McPherson v. McCabe

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 14, 2007
241 F. App'x 963 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 07-6641.

Submitted: September 11, 2007.

Decided: September 14, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:04-ct-00990-FL).

Stanford El Christopher McPherson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Stanford El Christopher McPherson, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McPherson v. McCabe, No. 5:04-ct-00990-FL (E.D.N.C. Apr. 10, 2007). We deny McPherson's motion for injunction and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

McPherson v. McCabe

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 14, 2007
241 F. App'x 963 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

McPherson v. McCabe

Case Details

Full title:Stanford El Christopher McPHERSON, Jr., a/k/a Chris Rattis, Plaintiff …

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Sep 14, 2007

Citations

241 F. App'x 963 (4th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Sanchez v. Hall

Equal Access Educ. v. Merten, 325 F. Supp. 2d 655, 660 (E.D. Va. 2004). Judge Flanagan rejected the identical…

Norris v. United States

Based upon the foregoing, the court finds that allowing the motion to amend would unnecessarily delay the…