From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McPherson v. Dade Tire Company

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 19, 1969
219 So. 2d 38 (Fla. 1969)

Opinion

No. 37991.

February 19, 1969.

Petition for review from the Industrial Commission.

Alfred D. Bieley, Miami, for petitioner.

Blackwell, Walker Gray and R.A. Ortmayer, Miami, for Dade Tire Co. and American Employers Ins. Co., respondents.

Harry M. Ross, Miami, for Austin Ford, Inc. and American Cas. Co., respondents.

Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondent.


The motion of Respondents, Dade Tire Company, American Employers Insurance Company, Austin Ford, Inc. and American Casualty Company, to quash or, in the alternative, to strike Petitioners brief have been duly considered by the Court and such motions are hereby severally denied.

On the merits, however, we have considered the petition for a writ of certiorari to review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date of September 13, 1968, and the briefs of respective counsel.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e., 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

Petitioner's application for attorneys fees is denied.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C.J., and ROBERTS, DREW, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McPherson v. Dade Tire Company

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 19, 1969
219 So. 2d 38 (Fla. 1969)
Case details for

McPherson v. Dade Tire Company

Case Details

Full title:ALPHONSO McPHERSON, PETITIONER, v. DADE TIRE COMPANY, INC.; AUSTIN FORD…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Feb 19, 1969

Citations

219 So. 2d 38 (Fla. 1969)