From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McPhail v. Wells Fargo Dealer Servs., Inc.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 13, 2014
575 F. App'x 181 (4th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 14-1057

06-13-2014

DOUGLAS E. MCPHAIL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO DEALER SERVICES, INC., Defendant - Appellee.

Douglas E. McPhail, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Elliot Bayzle, PARKER, POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:13-cv-00645-BO) Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Douglas E. McPhail, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Elliot Bayzle, PARKER, POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Douglas E. McPhail appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing the federal claims in his civil action for failure to state a claim, declining to exercise jurisdiction over the remaining state claims and remanding them to state court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McPhail v. Wells Fargo Dealer Servs., Inc., No. 5:13-cv-00645-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 23, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

McPhail v. Wells Fargo Dealer Servs., Inc.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 13, 2014
575 F. App'x 181 (4th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

McPhail v. Wells Fargo Dealer Servs., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS E. MCPHAIL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO DEALER SERVICES…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 13, 2014

Citations

575 F. App'x 181 (4th Cir. 2014)