From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McPhail v. Raynor

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 29, 2007
231 F. App'x 241 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 07-6607.

Submitted: June 21, 2007.

Decided: June 29, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, District Judge. (5:07-ct-03024-D).

Dexter McPhail, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Dexter McPhail appeals the district court's order dismissing his action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McPhail v. Raynor, No. 5:07-ct-03024-D (E.D.N.C. Mar. 27, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

McPhail v. Raynor

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 29, 2007
231 F. App'x 241 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

McPhail v. Raynor

Case Details

Full title:Dexter McPHAIL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rhonda RAYNOR; Norman Wayne…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 29, 2007

Citations

231 F. App'x 241 (4th Cir. 2007)