From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNitt v. Rosenblum

MISCELLANEOUS SUPREME COURT DISPOSITIONS
Jun 30, 2016
383 P.3d 853 (Or. 2016)

Opinion

S064090

06-30-2016

McNitt v. Rosenblum


Petitioner's argument that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 78 (2016) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035(2) to (6) is not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed ballot measure.


Summaries of

McNitt v. Rosenblum

MISCELLANEOUS SUPREME COURT DISPOSITIONS
Jun 30, 2016
383 P.3d 853 (Or. 2016)
Case details for

McNitt v. Rosenblum

Case Details

Full title:McNitt v. Rosenblum

Court:MISCELLANEOUS SUPREME COURT DISPOSITIONS

Date published: Jun 30, 2016

Citations

383 P.3d 853 (Or. 2016)
359 Or. 848