From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNelis v. Omniglow, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 11, 2013
Case No.: C 12-06468 MEJ (N.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: C 12-06468 MEJ

03-11-2013

KRISTIN MCNELIS Plaintiff, v. OMNIGLOW, LLC; IRA LEEMON; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants.

CURTIS J. MORRIS, ESQ. (SBN 98662) Law Offices of Curtis J. Morris XAVIER A.M. LAVOIPIERRE, ESQ. (SBN 132798) Law Office of Xavier A.M. Lavoipierre Attorneys for Plaintiff, KRISTIN MCNELIS JAMES PARTON, III, ESQ. (SBN 77698) RALPH R. RHOADES, ESQ. (SBN 100127) FRANCIS D. CONWAY, ESQ. (SBN 186207) PARTON | SELL | RHOADES A Professional Corporation Attorneys for Defendants, OMNIGLOW, LLC and IRA LEEMON


CURTIS J. MORRIS, ESQ. (SBN 98662)
Law Offices of Curtis J. Morris
XAVIER A.M. LAVOIPIERRE, ESQ. (SBN 132798)
Law Office of Xavier A.M. Lavoipierre
Attorneys for Plaintiff, KRISTIN MCNELIS JAMES PARTON, III, ESQ. (SBN 77698)
RALPH R. RHOADES, ESQ. (SBN 100127)
FRANCIS D. CONWAY, ESQ. (SBN 186207)
PARTON | SELL | RHOADES
A Professional Corporation
Attorneys for Defendants, OMNIGLOW, LLC and
IRA LEEMON

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

1. Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

2. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes:

[ ] Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

[ ] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

[×] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)

Private Process:

[ ] Private ADR (please identify process and provider) The parties have not yet identified a specific mediator for this matter.

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

[ ] the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)

[×] other requested deadline: July 31, 2013.

_____________

Plaintiff attorney

________________

Defendant attorney

[PROPOSED] ORDER

[×] The parties stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.

[ ] The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

Maria-Elena James

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

McNelis v. Omniglow, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 11, 2013
Case No.: C 12-06468 MEJ (N.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2013)
Case details for

McNelis v. Omniglow, LLC

Case Details

Full title:KRISTIN MCNELIS Plaintiff, v. OMNIGLOW, LLC; IRA LEEMON; and DOES 1…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 11, 2013

Citations

Case No.: C 12-06468 MEJ (N.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2013)