From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNeil v. Verga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 21, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1504 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-1504 EFB P

09-21-2011

JAMES MCNEIL, Plaintiff, v. T. VERGA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and is before the undersigned pursuant to plaintiff's consent. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; see also E.D. Cal. Local Rules, Appx. A, at (k)(4).

On July 15, 2011, the court found that plaintiff did not submit a certified copy of his trust account statement with his application to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, the court ordered plaintiff to file a completed in forma pauperis application together with the required certified copy of his prison trust account statement. The order gave plaintiff 30 days to file the required application and warned him that failure to do so might result in this action being dismissed.

The 30-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed a completed in forma pauperis affidavit or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, this action is dismissed without prejudice.

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

McNeil v. Verga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 21, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1504 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2011)
Case details for

McNeil v. Verga

Case Details

Full title:JAMES MCNEIL, Plaintiff, v. T. VERGA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 21, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-1504 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2011)