From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNeil v. Howard

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Sep 25, 2008
NO. CIV-07-1415-HE (W.D. Okla. Sep. 25, 2008)

Opinion

NO. CIV-07-1415-HE.

September 25, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner Delbert McNeil, a state prisoner appearing pro se, filed an action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 seeking federal habeas relief from his state court conviction. Consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), the matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Doyle W. Argo, who recommended that the action be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and in the alternative that habeas relief be denied on the merits.

Petitioner failed to object to the Report and Recommendation and thus waived his right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues it addressed. United States v. 2121 East 30th Street, 73 F.3d 1057, 1059-60 (10th Cir. 1996). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); LCvR72.1(a). The court has also considered the merits of the action and substantially concurs with the Magistrate Judge's conclusion.

Accordingly, the court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc.# 16], DENIES the petitioner's writ of habeas corpus [Doc. # 1].

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McNeil v. Howard

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Sep 25, 2008
NO. CIV-07-1415-HE (W.D. Okla. Sep. 25, 2008)
Case details for

McNeil v. Howard

Case Details

Full title:DELBERT McNEIL, Petitioner, v. BRUCE HOWARD, WARDEN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Sep 25, 2008

Citations

NO. CIV-07-1415-HE (W.D. Okla. Sep. 25, 2008)