From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNeil v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division
Mar 31, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-07-3664 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-07-3664.

March 31, 2009


ORDER


This court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge signed on March 16, 2009 and made a de novo determination of the Magistrate Judge's recommended disposition. Rule 72(b), Fed.R.Civ.P.; 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219 (5th Cir. 1989). Based on that review, this court adopts the Memorandum and Recommendation as this court's Memorandum and Order, granting the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and denying the defendant's motion. The ALJ's decision to deny McNeil disability benefits was not supported by substantial evidence. The ALJ's determination that McNeil is not disabled and the denial of disability benefits are reversed and this case is remanded for further development of the record as to the nature and extent of McNeil's physical and mental impairments.


Summaries of

McNeil v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division
Mar 31, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-07-3664 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2009)
Case details for

McNeil v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:BONNIE McNEIL, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division

Date published: Mar 31, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-07-3664 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2009)

Citing Cases

Harrison v. Colvin

"'[I]f an individual's medical treatment [which would include drug therapy] significantly interrupts the…