Opinion
No. 05-06-00631-CR.
Filed January 26, 2007. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex. R. App. P. 47.
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6, Dallas County, Texas. Trial Court Cause No. F05-51299-USX. AFFIRMED.
Before Justices FITZGERALD, RICHTER, and FRANCIS.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
A jury convicted Demarcus McNeely of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon, a firearm, and assessed punishment at twenty years imprisonment and a $10,000 fine. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.