From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNeely v. Reyes

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 2, 2021
2:20-cv-02551 EFB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-02551 EFB

06-02-2021

RUFUS McNEELY, Plaintiff, v. E. REYES, Defendant.


[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION

The Honorable Edmund F. Brennan Judge

Defendant E. Reyes has moved for a sixty-day extension of time, through July 27, 2021, to file and serve a dispositive motion concerning Plaintiff's complaint. The Court has read and considered Defendant's motion to change time and the accompanying declaration of counsel and, good cause appearing, Defendant's requested extension of time is GRANTED. The time in which Defendant may file a dispositive motion is extended through July 27, 2021.

Plaintiff's opposition to Defendant's dispositive motion shall be filed with the Court and served on Defendant no later than thirty days from the date Defendant's motion is filed. Defendant's reply brief shall be filed no later than fifteen days after Plaintiffs opposition is filed on the Court's electronic filing system. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. No. hearing will be held on the motion unless the Court so orders at a later date.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McNeely v. Reyes

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 2, 2021
2:20-cv-02551 EFB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2021)
Case details for

McNeely v. Reyes

Case Details

Full title:RUFUS McNEELY, Plaintiff, v. E. REYES, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 2, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-02551 EFB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2021)