From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNeal v. Evert

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 28, 2009
No. CIV S-05-0441 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-0441 GEB EFB P.

April 28, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. District courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court may request counsel voluntarily to represent such a plaintiff. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). The court finds that there are no exceptional circumstances in this case.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's April 23, 2009 motion for appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

McNeal v. Evert

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 28, 2009
No. CIV S-05-0441 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2009)
Case details for

McNeal v. Evert

Case Details

Full title:VERNON WAYNE McNEAL, Plaintiff, v. EVERT, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 28, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-05-0441 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2009)