From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNeal v. Ervin

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 17, 2009
No. CIV S-07-2240 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 17, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-2240 LKK EFB P.

March 17, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On January 22, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 22, 2009, are adopted in full; and

2. Claims against defendants R.K. Wong, R. Floto, N. Grannis, T. Felker, Rana, Lasky, Felice and Taylor are dismissed without prejudice.


Summaries of

McNeal v. Ervin

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 17, 2009
No. CIV S-07-2240 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 17, 2009)
Case details for

McNeal v. Ervin

Case Details

Full title:VERNON WAYNE McNEAL, Plaintiff, v. ERVIN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 17, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-07-2240 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 17, 2009)