From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNeal v. Doory

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 30, 2013
536 F. App'x 317 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-6715

07-30-2013

MICHAEL MCNEAL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HONORABLE TIMOTHY R. DOORY, Defendant - Appellee.

Michael McNeal, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00923-JKB) Before GREGORY, DAVIS, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael McNeal, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael McNeal appeals the district court's orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006), and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because McNeal's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, McNeal has forfeited appellate review of the court's orders. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

McNeal v. Doory

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jul 30, 2013
536 F. App'x 317 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

McNeal v. Doory

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL MCNEAL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HONORABLE TIMOTHY R. DOORY…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jul 30, 2013

Citations

536 F. App'x 317 (4th Cir. 2013)