From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNeal v. Custenborder

United States District Court, D. Kansas
May 8, 2008
Case No. 07-4125-JAR (D. Kan. May. 8, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 07-4125-JAR.

May 8, 2008


ORDER


This case comes before the court on Mary Beth Mudrick's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel (Doc. 31) for defendants Green and Hannan.

Ms. Mudrick's motion explains that Shelly Starr recently joined the City of Topeka's legal department. Because Ms. Starr has previously represented defendant Custenborder, in order to avoid a conflict of interest Ms. Mudrick seeks to withdraw as counsel for defendants Green and Hannan in their official capacities. Since Gregory Lee has already entered his appearance on behalf of defendants Green and Hannan in their official capacities, the court sees no reason why Ms. Mudrick's motion, which is in substantial compliance with D. Kan. Local Rule 83.5.5, should not be granted.

Accordingly, and for good cause shown,

IT IS ORDERED that Ms. Mudrick's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel (Doc. 31) is granted. The court clerk's office is directed to mail a copy of this order to defendants Green and Hannan, in accordance with D. Kan. Local Rule 83.5.5.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McNeal v. Custenborder

United States District Court, D. Kansas
May 8, 2008
Case No. 07-4125-JAR (D. Kan. May. 8, 2008)
Case details for

McNeal v. Custenborder

Case Details

Full title:FLOYD McNEAL, Plaintiff, v. MIKE CUSTENBORDER, OFFICER L. GREEN, AND…

Court:United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: May 8, 2008

Citations

Case No. 07-4125-JAR (D. Kan. May. 8, 2008)