From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNeal v. Bill Clements Prison Unit Susbtitute Counsel

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Jun 26, 2023
2:22-CV-248-Z-BR (N.D. Tex. Jun. 26, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-CV-248-Z-BR

06-26-2023

CEDRIC MCNEAL, Plaintiff, v. BILL CLEMENTS PRISON UNIT SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CIVIL RIGHTS CLAIM

MATTHEW J. KACSMARYK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court are the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge to dismiss the civil rights claim filed by Plaintiff. (ECF 5). No objections to the findings, conclusions, and recommendation have been filed. After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, the Court concludes that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct. It is therefore ORDERED that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are ADOPTED and the case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McNeal v. Bill Clements Prison Unit Susbtitute Counsel

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Jun 26, 2023
2:22-CV-248-Z-BR (N.D. Tex. Jun. 26, 2023)
Case details for

McNeal v. Bill Clements Prison Unit Susbtitute Counsel

Case Details

Full title:CEDRIC MCNEAL, Plaintiff, v. BILL CLEMENTS PRISON UNIT SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: Jun 26, 2023

Citations

2:22-CV-248-Z-BR (N.D. Tex. Jun. 26, 2023)