From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNeal v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 17, 2006
No. CIV S-06-1763-MCE-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1763-MCE-CMK-P.

August 17, 2006


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not, however, filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the required filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to submit either a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. Petitioner is warned that failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action. See Local Rule 11-110.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner shall submit on the form provided by the Clerk of the Court, within 30 days from the date of this order, a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, or the appropriate filing fee; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a new form Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.


Summaries of

McNeal v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 17, 2006
No. CIV S-06-1763-MCE-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2006)
Case details for

McNeal v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:TROY TERRELL McNEAL, Petitioner, v. DERREL G. ADAMS, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 17, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1763-MCE-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2006)