From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNaughton v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama
Sep 6, 2022
Civil Action 20-00500-B (S.D. Ala. Sep. 6, 2022)

Summary

explaining that “evidence from other medical sources, such as chiropractors, cannot establish the existence of a medically determinable impairment”

Summary of this case from Roby v. Kijakazi

Opinion

Civil Action 20-00500-B

09-06-2022

RACHEL M. MCNAUGHTON, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

SONJA F. BIVINS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In accordance with the Order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff's claim for a period of disability, disability insurance benefits, and supplemental security income be AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

McNaughton v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama
Sep 6, 2022
Civil Action 20-00500-B (S.D. Ala. Sep. 6, 2022)

explaining that “evidence from other medical sources, such as chiropractors, cannot establish the existence of a medically determinable impairment”

Summary of this case from Roby v. Kijakazi
Case details for

McNaughton v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:RACHEL M. MCNAUGHTON, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama

Date published: Sep 6, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 20-00500-B (S.D. Ala. Sep. 6, 2022)

Citing Cases

Roby v. Kijakazi

Dr. Esarco's opinions could not be considered at step 2 because a chiropractor's opinion is not an…