From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNall v. Credit Bureau of Josephine County

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Apr 17, 2008
Civ. No. 07-3075-CL (D. Or. Apr. 17, 2008)

Opinion

Civ. No. 07-3075-CL.

April 17, 2008


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been filed. This court reviews legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983).

I have given this matter de novo review. I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Clarke.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#26) is adopted. Defendant Mecca's motion to dismiss (#3), and defendant Credit Bureau of Josephine County's motion to dismiss (#15), are denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McNall v. Credit Bureau of Josephine County

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Apr 17, 2008
Civ. No. 07-3075-CL (D. Or. Apr. 17, 2008)
Case details for

McNall v. Credit Bureau of Josephine County

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL McNALL and KARYL McNALL, Plaintiffs, v. CREDIT BUREAU OF JOSEPHINE…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Apr 17, 2008

Citations

Civ. No. 07-3075-CL (D. Or. Apr. 17, 2008)

Citing Cases

Wilfong v. Persolve, LLC

Section 1692g(b), relating to validation of debts, provides in pertinent part that, if the consumer notifies…