From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNair v. Ibew

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 26, 2021
20-cv-08664-WHO (N.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2021)

Opinion

20-cv-08664-WHO

08-26-2021

CARL MCNAIR, Plaintiff, v. IBEW, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REQUIRING RESPONSE

William H. Orrick, United States District Judge.

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed this suit alleging unlawful discrimination claims against seven defendants. Dkt. No. 1. Five defendants have filed motions to dismiss plaintiff s claims. Dkt. Nos. 18 (IBEW, John O'Rourke); 20 (IBEW - Local 6); 23 (Edlen Electrical); 21/24 (San Francisco Electrical Contractors Association). Plaintiffs opposition or other response to these motions were due by August 20, 2021. As of the date of this Order, plaintiff has not filed an opposition or other response.

Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute by filing his opposition or other response to the pending motions by September 13, 2021. If plaintiff files an opposition or response by that date, defendants may file replies by September 22, 2021. The hearing on the pending motions to dismiss is reset to October 6, 2021

If plaintiff fails to file an opposition or other response to the pending motions to dismiss by September 13, 2021, this action will be DISMISSED for failure to prosecute Fed R. Civ. Proc. 41(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McNair v. Ibew

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 26, 2021
20-cv-08664-WHO (N.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2021)
Case details for

McNair v. Ibew

Case Details

Full title:CARL MCNAIR, Plaintiff, v. IBEW, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 26, 2021

Citations

20-cv-08664-WHO (N.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2021)