From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNabb v. Yates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 23, 2011
1:11-cv-01325-SMS (HC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2011)

Opinion

1:11-cv-01325-SMS (HC)

08-23-2011

RONNIE McNABB, Petitioner, v. J. A. YATES, Respondent.


ORDER OF TRANSFER

Petitioner is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

The federal venue statute requires that a civil action, other than one based on diversity jurisdiction, be brought only in "(1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all defendants reside in the same state, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of the property that is the subject of the action is situated, or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant may be found, if there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought." 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).

In this case, Petitioner challenges A 1982 conviction both the validity of his sentence. The proper venue for challenging the validity of his sentence is the district court containing the sentencing court, while the proper venue to challenge the execution of his sentence is the district court containing the prison in which Petitioner is incarcerated.

Although Petitioner has filed in the proper district court to challenge the execution of his sentence, this petition should be heard by the district court containing the sentencing court. Under 28 U.S.C. section 2254, this Court does not have jurisdiction to hear claims relating to the sentencing court where Petitioner was not sentenced in this district. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); Local Rule 191(g).

Petitioner is challenging a conviction from Los Angeles County Superior Court, which is in the Central District of California. Therefore, the petition should have been filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. In the interest of justice, a federal court may transfer a case filed in the wrong district to the correct district. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a); Starnes v. McGuire, 512 F.2d 918, 932 (D.C. Cir.1974).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sandra M. Snyder

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

McNabb v. Yates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 23, 2011
1:11-cv-01325-SMS (HC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2011)
Case details for

McNabb v. Yates

Case Details

Full title:RONNIE McNABB, Petitioner, v. J. A. YATES, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 23, 2011

Citations

1:11-cv-01325-SMS (HC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2011)