From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNabb v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 17, 1989
552 So. 2d 313 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-02228.

November 17, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Susan C. Bucklew, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and D.P. Chanco, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michele Taylor, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


The appellant, James O. McNabb, raises two issues. His first issue is without merit as this court has previously held that probation can be imposed consecutively to community control. Skeens v. State, 542 So.2d 436 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

For his second issue, the defendant contends, and the state agrees, that the trial court erred by imposing court costs without adequate notice or an opportunity to object as required by Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004 (Fla. 1989) and Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984). Accordingly, we strike the court costs without prejudice to the state seeking to have them reimposed after proper notice.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and HALL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McNabb v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 17, 1989
552 So. 2d 313 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

McNabb v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES O. McNABB, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Nov 17, 1989

Citations

552 So. 2d 313 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Smith v. State

However, the trial judge erred in imposing costs against appellant without adequate notice and an opportunity…