From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McMurray v. Jun

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 8, 2019
168 A.D.3d 435 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

8030 Index 650002/17

01-08-2019

Jennifer MCMURRAY, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. HYE WON JUN, Also Know as Helen Jun, Defendant–Respondent.

Law Office of Terry D. Horner, Poughkeepsie (Terry D. Horner of counsel), for appellant. Mintz & Gold LLP, New York (Timothy H. Wolf of counsel), for respondent.


Law Office of Terry D. Horner, Poughkeepsie (Terry D. Horner of counsel), for appellant.

Mintz & Gold LLP, New York (Timothy H. Wolf of counsel), for respondent.

Renwick, J.P., Manzanet–Daniels, Tom, Mazzarelli, Webber, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert R. Reed, J.), entered September 12, 2017, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's unjust enrichment claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

To successfully plead unjust enrichment "[a] plaintiff must show that (1) the other party was enriched, (2) at that party's expense, and (3) that it is against equity and good conscience to permit [the other party] to retain what is sought to be recovered" ( Mandarin Trading Ltd. v. Wildenstein, 16 N.Y.3d 173, 182, 919 N.Y.S.2d 465, 944 N.E.2d 1104 [2011] [internal quotation marks omitted] ). "Although privity is not required for an unjust enrichment claim" ( id. ), "a claim will not be supported unless there is a connection or relationship between the parties that could have caused reliance or inducement on the plaintiff's part" ( Georgia Malone & Co., Inc. v. Rieder, 86 A.D.3d 406, 408, 926 N.Y.S.2d 494 [1st Dept. 2011], affd 19 N.Y.3d 511, 950 N.Y.S.2d 333, 973 N.E.2d 743 [2012] ).

Plaintiff failed to state a cause of action for unjust enrichment against defendant. Although defendant was enriched by plaintiff's ex-husband, as the court noted, the funds belonged to him and plaintiff jointly. Plaintiff concedes that her ex-husband voluntarily gave defendant property and assets for his own benefit. Defendant was under no obligation to return property or assets voluntarily given to her by plaintiff's ex-husband. As noted by the court, plaintiff's claim against her former husband for dissipation of marital assets was released in the divorce proceeding.


Summaries of

McMurray v. Jun

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 8, 2019
168 A.D.3d 435 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

McMurray v. Jun

Case Details

Full title:Jennifer McMurray, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Hye Won Jun, also know as Helen…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 8, 2019

Citations

168 A.D.3d 435 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
168 A.D.3d 435
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 65

Citing Cases

TMT Entm't Grp., Inc. v. Michael Gasparro, Gasparro Mgmt. LLC

Unjust enrichment is sufficiently pled where the plaintiff shows that "(1) the other party was enriched, (2)…

One 32nd St. Corp. v. Stewart

Here, the relationship between plaintiff One 100 Street and defendant is, in fact, too attenuated to permit a…