McMullen v. Doughty

1 Citing case

  1. Shrevb v. Harvey

    74 N.J. Eq. 336 (Ch. Div. 1908)   Cited 6 times

    Counsel for the complainants must look to his clients for his extra allowance in this cause. That it is entitled to an allowance is clear (Strong & Sons v. Mundy, 52 N. J. Eq. 833, 31 Atl. 611), and, if I were at liberty to award it, I would hear the parties on the question of the amount of such counsel fee, and in advising the decree in this cause would report to the Chancellor what is a reasonable sum to be allowed (McMullin v. Doughty, 68 N. J. Eq. 776, 780, 55 Atl. 115, 284, 64 Atl. 1134). The execution may be issued to a master, owing to the involved and complicated distribution to be made of the proceeds of sale.