From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McMonagle v. Meyer

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Apr 3, 2015
782 F.3d 554 (9th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 12–15360.

04-03-2015

Brian Joseph McMONAGLE, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Don L. MEYER, Chief Probation Officer, Sacramento County, Respondent–Appellee.

Charles Marchand Bonneau, II, Esquire, Sacramento, CA, for Petitioner–Appellant. Brian G. Smiley, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent–Appellee.


Charles Marchand Bonneau, II, Esquire, Sacramento, CA, for Petitioner–Appellant.

Brian G. Smiley, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent–Appellee.

D.C. No. 2:11–cv–02115–GGH.

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35–3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.


Summaries of

McMonagle v. Meyer

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Apr 3, 2015
782 F.3d 554 (9th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

McMonagle v. Meyer

Case Details

Full title:Brian Joseph McMONAGLE, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Don L. MEYER, Chief…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Date published: Apr 3, 2015

Citations

782 F.3d 554 (9th Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

McMonagle v. Meyer

McMonagle v. Meyer, 766 F.3d 1151, 1158 (9th Cir.2014). A majority of the nonrecused active judges on our…