From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McMinn v. Dodson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 23, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01511-PAB-KMT (D. Colo. Apr. 23, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01511-PAB-KMT

04-23-2012

GLENN McMINN, Plaintiff, v. S.C.O. ROBERT DODSON, and ALLEN BIRT, Defendants.


Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya


MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA

Plaintiff's "Motion to Clarify Plaintiff's Motions That Have Been Stricken" (Doc. No. 92, filed January 25, 2012) is GRANTED in part. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1, the court will consider only a motion, response, and reply. The court need not consider other briefing.

Plaintiff's "Motion for Information Regarding Filing Subpoenas" (Doc. No. 93, Filed January 25, 2012) is GRANTED in part. To the extent Plaintiff wishes to serve subpoenas, he must comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 45.

To the extent that Plaintiff seeks further clarification of this court's orders, the court cannot provide Plaintiff with legal advice; notwithstanding his pro se status, Plaintiff must conduct his own legal research.


Summaries of

McMinn v. Dodson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 23, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01511-PAB-KMT (D. Colo. Apr. 23, 2012)
Case details for

McMinn v. Dodson

Case Details

Full title:GLENN McMINN, Plaintiff, v. S.C.O. ROBERT DODSON, and ALLEN BIRT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 23, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01511-PAB-KMT (D. Colo. Apr. 23, 2012)