From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McMillan v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Oct 3, 2023
675 S.W.3d 766 (Mo. Ct. App. 2023)

Opinion

WD 85615

10-03-2023

Matthew MCMILLAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Carol Jansen, Columbia, MO, counsel for appellant. Julia Rives, Jefferson City, MO, counsel for respondent.


Carol Jansen, Columbia, MO, counsel for appellant.

Julia Rives, Jefferson City, MO, counsel for respondent.

Before Division Two: W. Douglas Thomson, Presiding Judge, Thomas N. Chapman, Judge, and Janet Sutton, Judge

ORDER

Per Curiam: Matthew McMillan (McMillan) appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following evidentiary hearing. For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

McMillan v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Oct 3, 2023
675 S.W.3d 766 (Mo. Ct. App. 2023)
Case details for

McMillan v. State

Case Details

Full title:Matthew MCMILLAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Oct 3, 2023

Citations

675 S.W.3d 766 (Mo. Ct. App. 2023)