From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McManus v. McManus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 3, 2000
274 A.D.2d 378 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted May 30, 2000.

July 3, 2000.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff husband appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Mahon, J.), dated June 15, 1999, as granted the motion of the Law Guardian to unseal and release the transcript of an in camera interview with the infant Jacquelyn McManus to Police Detective Benjamin Trapbka of the Shelton, Connecticut Police Department.

Suzanne G. Parker, Roslyn Heights, N.Y., for appellant.

Edward J. Emanuele, Mineola, N.Y., Law Guardian for the child.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and the motion of the Law Guardian is denied.

Contrary to the contention of the Law Guardian representing the infant on appeal, the issue raised on appeal is not rendered academic simply because the Law Guardian has now adopted a position which differs from that propounded by the Law Guardian who represented the infant before the Supreme Court (see, People ex rel. Doe v. Beaudoin, 102 A.D.2d 359, 363).

The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in determining that the transcript of an in camera interview should be unsealed and released to a detective working for an out-of-state law enforcement agency (see, CPLR 4019[b]; Matter of Kathleen O., 232 A.D.2d 784, 786; Matter of Ladd v. Bellavia, 151 A.D.2d 1015, 1016).


Summaries of

McManus v. McManus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 3, 2000
274 A.D.2d 378 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

McManus v. McManus

Case Details

Full title:PAUL J. MCMANUS, APPELLANT, v. JESSICA L. MCMANUS, RESPONDENT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 3, 2000

Citations

274 A.D.2d 378 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
711 N.Y.S.2d 761

Citing Cases

Reed v. Reed

This incident has seriously threatened the sanctity of an in camera interview. (See Matter of Ladd v…

Reed v. Reed

This incident has seriously threatened the sanctity of an in camera interview. See, Matter of Ladd v.…