From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McMannus v. Midland Constructors

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division A
Oct 1, 1956
89 So. 2d 349 (Fla. 1956)

Opinion

July 31, 1956. Rehearing Denied October 1, 1956.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Vincent C. Giblin, Judge.

Kelner Lewis, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Ross Reinhardt, Miami, for appellees.


This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the rules of this court, 31 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

DREW, C.J., THOMAS and HOBSON, JJ., and ROWE, Associate Justice, concur.


Summaries of

McMannus v. Midland Constructors

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division A
Oct 1, 1956
89 So. 2d 349 (Fla. 1956)
Case details for

McMannus v. Midland Constructors

Case Details

Full title:JAMES R. McMANNUS, APPELLANT, v. MIDLAND CONSTRUCTORS, INC., AN ILLINOIS…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division A

Date published: Oct 1, 1956

Citations

89 So. 2d 349 (Fla. 1956)

Citing Cases

Miami Transit Co. v. Stephens

The rule is that when a trial court grants a new trial on the evidence, an appellate court should not reverse…

Kahn v. American Surety Co. of New York

The appellate court will not reverse an order granting a new trial, unless it clearly appears that a judicial…