From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McMahill v. Bzoskie

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Apr 15, 2009
CV 08-7188-AHM(E) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 15, 2009)

Opinion


MICHAEL MAURICE McMAHILL, Plaintiff, v. CMO DR. T. BZOSKIE, et al., Defendants. No. CV 08-7188-AHM(E) United States District Court, C.D. California. April 15, 2009

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          A. HOWARD MATZ, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The Court approves and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

         IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is approved and adopted; and (2) the First Amended Complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. If Plaintiff still wishes to pursue this action, he is granted thirty (30) days from the date of this Order within which to file a Second Amended Complaint. Any Second Amended Complaint shall be complete in itself. Plaintiff should not attempt to add additional defendants without leave of Court. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 21. Failure timely to file a Second Amended Complaint may result in dismissal of the action.


Summaries of

McMahill v. Bzoskie

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Apr 15, 2009
CV 08-7188-AHM(E) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 15, 2009)
Case details for

McMahill v. Bzoskie

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL MAURICE McMAHILL, Plaintiff, v. CMO DR. T. BZOSKIE, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Apr 15, 2009

Citations

CV 08-7188-AHM(E) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 15, 2009)