From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McLeod v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 14, 2005
890 So. 2d 553 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 5D04-4157.

January 14, 2005.

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Bob Wattles, Judge.

Wayne McLeod, Sneads, Pro Se.

No Appearance for Appellee.


Wayne McLeod appeals the summary denial of his Rule 3.800(a) motion, in which he contended that he should not have been convicted of failure to register as a sex offender. It appears that Mr. McLeod is not challenging his sentence. Instead, he is attempting to challenge his conviction. A challenge to a conviction is not cognizable under Rule 3.800(a). See e.g., Cook v. State, 885 So.2d 911 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Oxendine v. State, 852 So.2d 286 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

AFFIRMED.

PLEUS, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McLeod v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 14, 2005
890 So. 2d 553 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

McLeod v. State

Case Details

Full title:Wayne McLEOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jan 14, 2005

Citations

890 So. 2d 553 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)