From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McLeod v. Pee Dee Knitting Mills

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Feb 11, 1924
127 S.C. 482 (S.C. 1924)

Opinion

11419

February 11, 1924.

Before MAULDIN, J., Chesterfield. Reversed and remanded.

Action by Vernon McLeod against the Pee Dee Knitting Mills. From a judgment of nonsuit, plaintiff appeals.

Mr. R.E. Hanna for appellant.

Mr. C.L. Prince for respondent.


February 11, 1924. The opinion of the Court was delivered by


The "Case" contains this statement: That the action is "a suit for damages for the high-handed, unlawful, etc., withholding of wages alleged to be due the appellant by the respondent." Inasmuch as the defendant admits in its answer that there is due the plaintiff $5.46 upon account of wages, regardless of the issue of punitive damages, the nonsuit should not have been ordered.

The judgment of this Court is that the judgment of the Circuit Court be reversed, and that the case be remanded to that Court for a new trial.


Summaries of

McLeod v. Pee Dee Knitting Mills

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Feb 11, 1924
127 S.C. 482 (S.C. 1924)
Case details for

McLeod v. Pee Dee Knitting Mills

Case Details

Full title:McLEOD v. PEE DEE KNITING MILLS

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Feb 11, 1924

Citations

127 S.C. 482 (S.C. 1924)
121 S.E. 373

Citing Cases

Hadden v. South Carolina Tax Comm

Messrs. John M. Daniel, Attorney General, and ClaudeK. Wingate, for appellant, cite: Surtax on interest and…

Cooper River Bridge, Inc. v. S.C. Tax Comm. et al

Messrs. John M. Daniel, Attorney General, and Claude K.Wingate, for appellants, cite: Where road dedicated to…