From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McLeod v. Mills

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Corpus Christi Division
Aug 30, 2008
Case No. 08-mc-46 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 30, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 08-mc-46.

August 30, 2008


ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION


The United States Magistrate Judge filed her Memorandum and Recommendation on June 30, 2008 (D.E. 4). As of this date, Plaintiff has not filed any objections. Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauper is (D.E. 1).

When no timely objection to the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation is filed, the Court need only satisfy itself that there is no "clear error" on the face of the record in order to accept the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996) (citing FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) advisory committee's note (1983)).

Having reviewed the pleadings and motions on file, the Court finds no clear error in the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. The Court accepts the Magistrate Judge's decision. The Court DENIES Plaintiff's Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.

ORDERED


Summaries of

McLeod v. Mills

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Corpus Christi Division
Aug 30, 2008
Case No. 08-mc-46 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 30, 2008)
Case details for

McLeod v. Mills

Case Details

Full title:K.V. McLEOD Plaintiff, v. HERBERT MILLS Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Corpus Christi Division

Date published: Aug 30, 2008

Citations

Case No. 08-mc-46 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 30, 2008)