From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McLemore v. Walmart Inc.

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Feb 26, 2020
Civil Action No. 4:18-CV-689 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 26, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 4:18-CV-689

02-26-2020

RHONDA M. MCLEMORE v. WALMART INC., LLC TEXAS STORES, ET AL.


(Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak) MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On January 31, 2020, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #128) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Paul Bowman's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint (Dkt. #73) be granted.

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant Paul Bowman's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint (Dkt. #73) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Paul Bowman are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 26th day of February, 2020.

/s/_________

AMOS L. MAZZANT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

McLemore v. Walmart Inc.

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Feb 26, 2020
Civil Action No. 4:18-CV-689 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 26, 2020)
Case details for

McLemore v. Walmart Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RHONDA M. MCLEMORE v. WALMART INC., LLC TEXAS STORES, ET AL.

Court:United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 26, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 4:18-CV-689 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 26, 2020)

Citing Cases

Brown v. City of Anna City Hall

Plaintiff's response, to the extent it could be construed as an amendment, does not plausibly allege facts…