From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McLean v. Plant Fruit Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 23, 1964
167 So. 2d 332 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

Opinion

No. 5312.

September 23, 1964.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, Roger D. Flynn, J.

John W. Boult, of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings, Glos Evans, Tampa, for appellants.

Marvin E. Barkin, of Fowler, White, Gillen, Humkey Trenam, Tampa, for appellee.


This matter is before the Court on the Motion of the appellee to dismiss.

After the filing of an amended complaint at law for damages for breach of contract, answer and counterclaim were filed. The Court entered a summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint, but left pending the counterclaim. Under such circumstances the judgment dismissing the complaint is a partial summary judgment and therefore interlocutory, and not appealable within the meaning of Florida Statutes, § 59.2(1), F.S.A. and Florida Appellate Rule 3.2, subd. b, 31 F.S.A.

Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is granted.

SMITH, C.J., and ALLEN and ANDREWS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McLean v. Plant Fruit Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 23, 1964
167 So. 2d 332 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)
Case details for

McLean v. Plant Fruit Company

Case Details

Full title:J.E. McLEAN, J.E. McLEAN, JR., AND J.E. McLEAN, III, CO-PARTNERS, TRADING…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Sep 23, 1964

Citations

167 So. 2d 332 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

Citing Cases

Taussig v. Ins. Co. of North America

Fla.App.2d 1971, 249 So.2d 726. Fla.App.2d 1964, 167 So.2d 332. Fla.App.2d 1973, 287 So.2d…

Morse v. Hendry Corporation

The defendant has filed its motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it is an interlocutory order at…