From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McLean v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Sep 26, 2012
Case No. 11-1222-SAC (D. Kan. Sep. 26, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 11-1222-SAC

09-26-2012

CRAIG McLEAN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


NUNC PRO TUNC MINUTE ORDER

BY THE DIRECTION OF THE HONORABLE SAM A. CROW, U.S. DISTRICT SENIOR JUDGE:

The Memorandum and Order (Doc. 17) in the above entitled matter inadvertently omitted a citation to authority. At the bottom of page 18 continuing to the top of page 19 is the following sentence:

"However, the table rules do not direct a conclusion of "disabled" or "not disabled" when an individual's exertional RFC does not coincide with the exertional criteria of any one of the exertional ranges (i.e., sedentary, light)"
At the end of this sentence, the citation to authority should appear; therefore, the order is hereby corrected to include this citation at the end of the above sentence: "S.S.R. 83-12, 1983 WL 31253 at

Dated this 26th day of September, 2012, at Topeka, Kansas.

TIMOTHY M. O'BRIEN, CLERK

By Brenda M. Wessel

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

McLean v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Sep 26, 2012
Case No. 11-1222-SAC (D. Kan. Sep. 26, 2012)
Case details for

McLean v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:CRAIG McLEAN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Date published: Sep 26, 2012

Citations

Case No. 11-1222-SAC (D. Kan. Sep. 26, 2012)