From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McLaughlin v. Cox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Sep 18, 2015
Case No. 2:14-cv-00178-APG-PAL (D. Nev. Sep. 18, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 2:14-cv-00178-APG-PAL

09-18-2015

MICHAEL T. MCLAUGHLIN, Plaintiff, v. JAMES G. COX, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS

(Dkt. #43)

IT IS ORDERED that the defendants' motion for extension of time to file motion for summary judgment (Dkt. #43) is GRANTED. If the court grants the plaintiff's motion for leave to amend his complaint, and discovery reopens, dispositive motions must be filed 30 days following the close of discovery. If the court denies the plaintiff's motion for leave to amend, dispositive motions must be filed 30 days from the date of the court's order.

DATED this 18th day of September, 2015.

/s/_________

ANDREW P. GORDON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

McLaughlin v. Cox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Sep 18, 2015
Case No. 2:14-cv-00178-APG-PAL (D. Nev. Sep. 18, 2015)
Case details for

McLaughlin v. Cox

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL T. MCLAUGHLIN, Plaintiff, v. JAMES G. COX, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Sep 18, 2015

Citations

Case No. 2:14-cv-00178-APG-PAL (D. Nev. Sep. 18, 2015)