From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McLane v. City of Denver

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 8, 2020
Civil Action No. 20-cv-00044-DDD-NYW (D. Colo. May. 8, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 20-cv-00044-DDD-NYW

05-08-2020

JONATHAN MCLANE, JOHN THOMAS COOPER, JR., and KATIE ETCHEVERRY, Plaintiffs, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, MICHAEL B. HANCOCK, AMANDA P. SANDOVAL, KEVIN FLYNN, JAMIE TORRES, KENDRA BLACK, AMANDA SAWYER, PAUL KASHMANN, JOLON CLARK, CHRISTOPHER HERNDON, CANDI CDEBACA, CHRIS HINDS, STACIE GILMORE, ROBIN KNIECH, DEBORAH ORTEGA, KRISTIN M. BRONSON, MICHAEL J. HYMAN, PAUL PAZEN, BARB ARCHER, RON THOMAS, and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court is the recommendation (Doc. 27) of United States Magistrate Nina Y. Wang that the Court dismiss this case without prejudice due to Plaintiffs Jonathan McLane, John Thomas Cooper, Jr., and Katie Etcheverry's failure to prosecute. The recommendation states that objections to the recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after its service on the parties. (Doc. 27 at 5 n.2 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 36(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Griego v. Padilla (In re Griego), 64 F.3d 580, 583 (10th Cir. 1995).) The recommendation was served on the parties on April 22, 2020 at the addresses they provided to the Court, and no party has objected to the recommendation.

In the absence of a timely objection, the Court may review a magistrate judge's recommendation under any standard it deems appropriate. Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150, 154 (1985)). In this matter, the Court has reviewed the recommendation to satisfy itself that there is "no clear error on the face of the record." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) Advisory Committee Notes. Based on that review, the Court has concluded that the recommendation is a correct application of the facts and the law.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 27) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED; and the case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE based on Plaintiffs' failure to prosecute and failure to comply with Court orders. DATED: May 8, 2020

BY THE COURT:

/s/_________

Hon. Daniel D. Domenico


Summaries of

McLane v. City of Denver

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 8, 2020
Civil Action No. 20-cv-00044-DDD-NYW (D. Colo. May. 8, 2020)
Case details for

McLane v. City of Denver

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN MCLANE, JOHN THOMAS COOPER, JR., and KATIE ETCHEVERRY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: May 8, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 20-cv-00044-DDD-NYW (D. Colo. May. 8, 2020)