From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McLain v. Roddam

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 10, 2018
2:17-cv-01634-VEH-JEO (N.D. Ala. Jul. 10, 2018)

Opinion

2:17-cv-01634-VEH-JEO

07-10-2018

CEDRIC LYNN MCLAIN, Plaintiff, v. DR. ROY RODDAM, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OF OPINION

The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendation on June 18, 2018, recommending that the defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted and this cause be dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 19). No objections have been filed by any party.

Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the Court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge's report is due to be and is hereby ADOPTED and his recommendation is ACCEPTED. The Court EXPRESSLY FINDS that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that the defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, defendants' motion for summary judgment is due to be GRANTED and this action is due to be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A Final Judgment will be entered.

DONE this the 10th day of July, 2018.

/s/_________

VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS

United States District Judge


Summaries of

McLain v. Roddam

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 10, 2018
2:17-cv-01634-VEH-JEO (N.D. Ala. Jul. 10, 2018)
Case details for

McLain v. Roddam

Case Details

Full title:CEDRIC LYNN MCLAIN, Plaintiff, v. DR. ROY RODDAM, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 10, 2018

Citations

2:17-cv-01634-VEH-JEO (N.D. Ala. Jul. 10, 2018)